Rakesh's movie talk
Spider-Man (2002)
|
|||||
|
||||
Before going to my comments, here are the flaws in this movie. Not to get you discouraged, but I am writing this to cool
myself down before getting excited and write in terms of superlative vocabularies for the movie. Okay. What do I think of the movie? Apart from the above flaws, the movie is the best superhero caper I had seen on screen
after the first two Batman. Go to Movie Review Query Engine and you will see that most critics think it is the best
after Superman. Well, Superman stood test of time, especially with its special effect. So did the first
two Batmans, but Spidey may not. Why? The poorly executed CGIs. On top of all, I was impressed with Tobey Maguire's performance as Peter Parker. Certainly a character we can relate to.
It may be stereotype (bullied in school and never gets the girl), but the way Maguire plays it, we are seeing something fresh.
It reminded me of Christopher Reeves' portrayal of Clark Kent. Moving, funny and fascinating. Especially so, when Peter first
discovers his powers. I felt like a kid, experiencing the delight of suddenly having a good vision, pent up muscles, and ability
to climb walls. Not to mention, the web, which does not come from an external device, but from his body. Watch out for the
scene where he tries to shoot the web. This kid is aware of other comic superheroes. The movie is more reminiscent of the sixties TV cartoon serial than the comic book. Swinging from building to building,
you get to see all the moves and pose Spidey strikes in both media. We get to see montages of our superhero saving the citizens'
skin, including thrice of Mary Jane's. The fight between Spidey and Goblin is a bit on the lower scale, but they are so in
order to give way for the film to develop the characters, which is necessary. The movie ends with some things hanging - an opening for sequel. As you might know already, Maguire and Durnst had
already signed for sequel. Somehow, I have a feeling that it is going to be better. If and only if the filmmaker realises
some of the flaws and repair it. Hell, a sequel can be a better remake (like the Escape movies). |
||||